Lakers-Timberwolves: 5 takeaways as Luka Dončić delivers in Game 2

Luka Dončić scores 16 of his 31 points in a dominating 1st quarter and adds 12 rebounds and 9 assists to lead the Lakers in Game 2.

LOS ANGELES — The Los Angeles Lakers managed to earn the No. 3 seed in the Western Conference by using a vastly improved defense, all-around play from LeBron James and, of course, the welcome addition of Luka Dončić.

And all of those advantages showed up in the first-round playoff series with the Minnesota Timberwolves — a game late, but just in time.

The Lakers never trailed after the first few minutes of Game 2, led by double digits almost until the very end, flexed their star power when necessary and sent the Wolves home feeling frustrated and maybe a little less confident about this series.

Yes, Minnesota did gain a split at Crypto.com Arena overall, for what that’s worth, but they also know the Lakers are willing and able to match their style — low scoring and physical if necessary.

“The mentality for both teams is to have a rock fight,” Lakers coach JJ Redick said.

Here are Five Takeaways from the Lakers’ 94-85 victory and a series that’s now tied at one apiece:

1. Still no answer for Dončić

In the 2024 Western Conference Finals, Dončić sent the Wolves off to summer vacation. It was a thorough takedown that earned Dončić the conference finals MVP award. Dončić averaged 32.4 points, 9.6 rebounds, and 8.2 assists and shot 47% from the field (43% from deep) and 85% from the line. He was beastly.

A change of uniforms from Dallas to L.A. hasn’t resulted in a change of … results. At least so far. As celebrated as Minnesota’s defense was then and now, there’s no solution for Dončić. Through two games, he’s the best player on a floor shared with LeBron and Anthony Edwards.

He’s hunting Rudy Gobert on isolations — the crowd noise was deafening with anticipation when that happened — and having his way against Jaden McDaniels, too. He finished one assist shy of a 31-point triple-double in Game 2 and is averaging 34 points for the series.

Minnesota rarely doubles opposing players — their one-on-one defense is that good — but Dončić is testing that strategy. It might be time for a tweak.

Inside the NBA: Are the Lakers relying too heavily on Luka Dončić in isolation?

2. Wolves fell for the Game 1 fool’s gold

Minnesota made 21 3-pointers in the opener. Jaden McDaniels scored 25 points and missed only two shots. Those difference-makers helped the Wolves seize an early series advantage.

But this team doesn’t usually make as many 3-pointers, and certainly not at a 50% rate. As for McDaniels, he’s a defensive specialist … and just a career 10-point scorer who averaged 12 this season. That means anyone who thought the Wolves would keep up the pace was perhaps fooling themselves.

They shot 5-for-25 on 3-pointers on Tuesday, which is usually the recipe for doom. McDaniels struggled, going 0-for-3 from distance as he scored eight points.

The Wolves lacked an additional scorer on a night when points were hard to generate. It was just Julius Randle (career playoff-high 27 points) and Anthony Edwards (25), who appeared passive despite taking 22 shots.

3. Lakers manage without a center

It’s hard enough for big men in today’s league, and this series isn’t helping their reputation. The Lakers have essentially gone two games without playing one. Meanwhile, Gobert, the Wolves’ starting center, is a non-factor.

Starting Lakers center Jaxson Hayes is foul-prone — he had five in nine minutes of playing time Tuesday — and doesn’t rebound or score well enough to command more minutes. That’s why the Lakers played small ball instead. They have that luxury because Gobert presents no challenge for them defensively. He’s not in the Wolves’ playbook, and when the ball did find him, he fumbled passes and took only five shots.

Advantage, Lakers. This is a poor matchup for Gobert, who doesn’t have a low-post opponent to guard and is constantly baited into switches where suddenly he’s staring at containing Dončić or James.

4. Wolves’ bench takes a seat

They ambushed the Lakers in the first game of the series, outscoring their bench 43-13. At times, Minnesota’s reserves were better than its starters. Yes, Minnesota’s bench was that much of a difference-maker … and that much of a ghost for much of Game 2.

Naz Reid went from being unstoppable — he had 23 points — to vaporizing. He committed silly fouls in the first half and was forced to sit early with his third. He went scoreless through three quarters. And he made only one 3-pointer after swishing six in Game 1.

Ditto for Donte DiVincenzo, who went from aggressive in Game 1 to reckless in Game 2 with fouls (four, along with one field goal) and just 16 minutes.

5. Is defense here to stay?

The Lakers scored 95 points in Game 1, then 94 in Game 2. While there’s no automatic carryover from game to game, it’s fair to suggest these teams won’t set any scoring records in this series based on what they’ve given so far.

Once the Wolves set the tone for the series in the first game, the Lakers had no choice but to match. And for a team whose defense was faulty at the start of the season, the Lakers have come a long way to be on the same level as Minnesota.

“The emphasis was to play harder, match physicality with physicality,” said Austin Reaves.

The Wolves had only 15 first-quarter points, the Lakers only 36 second-half points. Both teams shot just 20% from deep. There were droughts caused by poor execution, solid defense and sometimes both.

The Lakers do have three creators in Reaves, Dončić and James. The Wolves have just one in Edwards. Those are odds in L.A.’s favor as the series shifts to Minnesota. If there’s a sudden offensive surge, LeBron expects it to belong to the Lakers.

“We can still be better offensively,” James said. “I thought we had some great looks. If we continue to get looks like that, I trust our percentages.”

* * *

Shaun Powell has covered the NBA for more than 25 years. You can e-mail him here, find his archive here and follow him on X.

The views on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of the NBA, its clubs or Warner Bros. Discovery.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *