The Senate narrowly passed Republicans’ sprawling bill to slash taxes and social safety net programs. Vice President JD Vance cast the tiebreaking vote, after three Republican senators — Susan Collins, Thom Tillis and Rand Paul — voted no.
The bill extends roughly $3.8 trillion in tax cuts enacted during Trump’s first term and increases funding for border security and the military. It cuts about $1.1 trillion from health care programs, mainly Medicaid, which experts estimate will cause nearly 12 million Americans to lose coverage. The bill, which could affect millions of Americans, is a major political gamble, Carl Hulse writes.
The House must now decide whether to pass the Senate’s version of the bill or try to reconcile it with its own. Any delays could mean that Congress misses the July 4 deadline that Trump set.
The Morning’s readers were interested in the bill yesterday (it was our most-clicked link). Here’s more from Times reporters who were in the Capitol:
- In all, senators voted 49 times during a 27-hour marathon session. They wore fluffy blankets and pullover sweatshirts inside the chilly chamber.
- Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, cast a deciding vote for the bill after winning carveouts for her state. “Do I like this bill? No,” she told NBC News afterward. “But I tried to take care of Alaska’s interests.”
- Trump and Elon Musk returned to jousting on social media about the legislation.
- The bill’s policies could inflict major financial pain on poor Americans.
- Republicans have insisted that the policy package will help seniors and the middle class. Here’s a fact check.
Video
The New York Times Supreme Court reporter Adam Liptak recaps this Supreme Court term, which was defined by a disproportionate amount of emergency docket cases. Liptak explains why these cases tended to go in the Trump administration’s favor.
The end of June is some combination of Christmas and Tax Day for Adam Liptak, who has covered the Supreme Court for The Times since 2008. That’s when the justices release a dizzying array of rulings: This term’s major cases, some of which were decided earlier in the year, touched on guns, porn, police tactics, religion, citizenship, L.G.B.T.Q. rights, vapes and TikTok.
Note: Chart shows nine-person decisions that were orally argued and signed.
Sources: Lee Epstein and Andrew D. Martin, Washington University in St. Louis; Michael J. Nelson, Penn State from the Supreme Court Database
By The New York Times
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
